motivation of definition of constructible numbers
In order to understand the significance of constructible numbers and how they are useful in solving problems in Euclidean geometry![]()
, we need to determine how the definitions and properties of these numbers relate to Euclidean geometry.
To start with, let us investigate some properties of , the field of real constructible numbers:
-
1.
;
-
2.
If , then also , , and , the last of which is meaningful only when ;
-
3.
If and , then .
It turns out that the nonnegative elements of are in one-to-one correspondence with lengths of constructible line segments![]()
(http://planetmath.org/Constructible2). Let us determine why this is:
First of all, and are self-evident, as these are basic requirements for to be a field. Moreover, corresponds to the tacit assumption in compass and straightedge construction that a line segment of length is constructible (http://planetmath.org/Constructible2).
Secondly, if , which should mean that line segments of lengths and are constructible, then we can easily construct line segments of lengths and by matching up endpoints![]()
of line segments.
Thirdly, if , then we can construct a line segment of length by the compass and straightedge construction of similar triangles.
Fourthly, if and , we can construct a line segment of length by the compass and straightedge construction of inverse point. By the previous paragraph, multiplication by poses no problems.
Finally, if and , then we can construct a line segment of length by the compass and straightedge construction of geometric mean, letting and .
Now to address the definition of , the field of constructible numbers:
-
1.
;
-
2.
If , then also , , and , the last of which is meaningful only when ;
-
3.
If and where , then .
It turns out that the elements of are in one-to-one correspondence with the constructible points (http://planetmath.org/Constructible2) of the complex plane![]()
. Let us determine why this is:
Rule 1 is similarly justified as above.
In order to justify rule 2, all we need is the justification of rule 2 for along with the notion of copying an angle. For example, if , then the following picture can be made by copying an angle:
Finally to justify rule 3. If , then , so we have that . Since , we must have that an angle with measure (http://planetmath.org/AngleMeasure) is constructible. By the compass and straightedge construction of angle bisector![]()
, an angle with measure is also constructible.
| Title | motivation of definition of constructible numbers |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | MotivationOfDefinitionOfConstructibleNumbers |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 17:16:05 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 17:16:05 |
| Owner | Wkbj79 (1863) |
| Last modified by | Wkbj79 (1863) |
| Numerical id | 7 |
| Author | Wkbj79 (1863) |
| Entry type | Topic |
| Classification | msc 12D15 |
| Classification | msc 51M15 |
| Related topic | CompassAndStraightedgeConstruction |