standard duality on modules over algebras


Let k be a field and let A be an associative unital algebra. Throughout we will assume that all A-modules over k are unital. If M is a right A-module, then the space of all linear mappings

Homk⁢(M,k)

can be equipped with a left A-module structureMathworldPlanetmath as follows: for any f∈Homk⁢(M,k) and a∈A put

(a⁢f)⁢(x)=f⁢(x⁢a).

Note that action direction need to be reversed, because

(a⁢b⁢f)⁢(x)=(b⁢f)⁢(x⁢a)=f⁢(x⁢a⁢b).

Analogously Homk⁢(-,k) takes left A-modules to right A-modules. Also this action is compatible with functoriality of Homk⁢(-,k), which means that it takes A-homomorphismsMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath to A-homomorphisms. In particular we obtain a (contravariant) functorMathworldPlanetmath from categoryMathworldPlanetmath of left (right) A-modules to category of right (left) A-modules. Obviously Hom does not change the dimension of spaces, so we have well defined functors

D:mod⁢A→A⁢mod
D:A⁢mod→mod⁢A

which are restrictionsPlanetmathPlanetmath of Hom (here mod means finite dimensional modules left/right modules) and are known in literature as ,,standard dualities”.

PropositionPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath. Both D’s are quasi inverseMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath dualities of categories.

Proof. Let M be a finite dimensional A-module. We need to define a natural isomorphism between M and D⁢D⁢(M). Indeed, define

τM:M→D⁢D⁢(M);
τM⁢(m)⁢(α)=α⁢(m).

We will show that each τ is an isomorphismMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath.

  1. 1.

    First we will show that τ is a monomorphismMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath. Assume that τM⁢(m)=0 for nonzero m∈M. This is if and only if α⁢(m)=0 for every linear mapping α:M→k. But m is nonzero, so there is a basis of M (as linear space) which contains m. In particular there is a linear mapping f:M→k such that f⁢(m)=1. ContradictionMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath. Thus m=0, which completesPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath this part.

  2. 2.

    τ is an epimorphismMathworldPlanetmath. Indeed, let F:D⁢(M)→k be a linear mapping. We need to show, that there is m∈M such that

    F⁢(α)=α⁢(m)

    for any α∈D⁢(M). Since M is finite dimensional, then let {e1,…,en} be a k-basis of M. Of course {e1*,…,en*} is a basis of D⁢(M), where ei* is given by ei*⁢(ej)=1 if i=j and ei*⁢(ej)=0 otherwise. Define

    λi=F⁢(ei*)

    and put

    m=∑i=1nλi⋅ei.

    We leave it as a simple exercise, that τ⁢(m)=F.

What remains is to prove, that τ is natural. Consider an A-homomorphism f:X→Y. We need to show that the following diagram commutes:

\xymatrix⁢X⁢\ar⁢[r]f⁢\ar⁢[d]τX⁢&⁢Y⁢\ar⁢[d]τY⁢D⁢D⁢(X)⁢\ar⁢[r]D⁢D⁢(f)⁢&⁢D⁢D⁢(Y)

Indeed, if x∈X, then let F=τX⁢(x). We have that

D⁢D⁢(f)⁢(F)=F∘D⁢(f)

and evaluating this at α∈D⁢(M) we have

F⁢(D⁢(f)⁢(α))=F⁢(α∘f)=(α∘f)⁢(x)=α⁢(f⁢(x))=τY⁢(f⁢(x))⁢(α).

In particular we obtain that

D⁢D⁢(f)⁢(τX⁢(x))=τY⁢(f⁢(x))

which means that

D⁢D⁢(f)∘τX=τY∘f

which completes the proof. □

Title standard duality on modules over algebras
Canonical name StandardDualityOnModulesOverAlgebras
Date of creation 2013-12-11 15:25:39
Last modified on 2013-12-11 15:25:39
Owner joking (16130)
Last modified by joking (16130)
Numerical id 5
Author joking (16130)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 16S99
Classification msc 20C99
Classification msc 13B99