class number divisibility in extensions
Throughout this entry we will use the following corollary to the existence of the Hilbert class field (see the parent entry, unramified extensions and class number divisibility for details of the proof).
Corollary 1.
Let K be a number field, hK is its class number
and let p be a prime. Then K has an everywhere unramified Galois extension
of degree p if and only if hK is divisible by p.
In this entry we are concerned about the divisibility properties of class numbers of number fields in extensions.
Theorem 1.
Let F/K be a Galois extension of number fields, let hF and hK be their respective class numbers and let p be a prime number such that p does not divide [F:K], the degree of the extension. Then, if p divides hK, the class number of F, hF, is also divisible by p.
Proof.
Let F, K and p be as in the statement of the theorem. Assume that p|hK. Thus, by the corollary above, there exists an unramified Galois extension field E of K of degree p. Notice that the fact that p does not divide the degree of the extension F/K implies that F∩E=K. In particular, the compositum FE is a Galois extension of F and
Gal(FE/F)≅Gal(E/E∩F)≅Gal(E/K). |
Thus, the extension FE/F is of degree p, Galois, and therefore abelian. By the corollary above, in order to prove the theorem it suffices to show that the extension FE/F is unramified. Suppose for a contradiction that 𝒬F is a prime ideal
which ramifies in the extension FE/F. Let 𝒬EF be a prime lying above 𝒬F and let 𝒬K be a prime of K such that 𝒬F lies above it. Similarly, let 𝒬E be a prime of E lying above 𝒬K and such that the prime 𝒬EF lies above 𝒬E. For an arbitrary extension A/B, the ramification index of a prime 𝒬A is denoted by e(𝒬B|𝒬A). Then, by the multiplicativity of the ramification index in towers, we have:
e(𝒬EF|𝒬K)=e(𝒬EF|𝒬F)⋅e(𝒬F|𝒬K)=e(𝒬EF|𝒬E)⋅e(𝒬E|𝒬K) |
Since we assumed that 𝒬F is ramified in EF/F, and the degree of the extension is p, we must have e(𝒬EF|𝒬F)=p. Therefore, by the equality above, p divides e(𝒬EF|𝒬E)⋅e(𝒬E|𝒬K). Notice that the extension E/K is everywhere unramified, therefore e(𝒬E|𝒬K)=1. Also, [EF:E]=[F:K] which, by hypothesis, is relatively prime to p. Thus e(𝒬EF|𝒬E) is also relatively prime to p, and so, p is not a divisor
of e(𝒬EF|𝒬E)⋅e(𝒬E|𝒬K), which leads to the desired contradiction, finishing the proof of the theorem.
∎
Also, read the entry extensions without unramified subextensions and class number divisibility for a similar and more general result.
Title | class number divisibility in extensions |
Canonical name | ClassNumberDivisibilityInExtensions |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 15:04:17 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 15:04:17 |
Owner | alozano (2414) |
Last modified by | alozano (2414) |
Numerical id | 9 |
Author | alozano (2414) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 11R37 |
Classification | msc 11R32 |
Classification | msc 11R29 |
Related topic | IdealClass |
Related topic | ExistenceOfHilbertClassField |
Related topic | CompositumOfAGaloisExtensionAndAnotherExtensionIsGalois |
Related topic | DecompositionGroup |
Related topic | ExtensionsWithoutUnramifiedSubextensionsAndClassNumberDivisibility |
Related topic | ClassNumbersAndDiscriminantsTopicsOnClassGroups |