Proof. Denote the sequence
of prime numbers by p1<p2<p3<… For any s>0, we can form convergent

geometric series

|
11-1ps1= 1+1ps1+1p2s1+…=∞∑ν1=01pν1s1, |
|
|
11-1ps2= 1+1ps2+1p2s2+…=∞∑ν2=01pν2s2. |
|
Since these series are absolutely convergent, their product (see multiplication of series) may be written as
|
11-1ps1⋅11-1ps2=∞∑ν1,ν2=01pν1s1⋅1pν2s2=∞∑ν1,ν2=01(pν11pν22)s |
|
where ν1 and ν2 independently on each other run all nonnegative integers. This equation can be generalised by induction to
|
k∏ν=111-1psν=∞∑ν1,ν2,…,νk=01(pν11pν22⋯pνkk)s |
|
(3) |
for s>0 and for arbitrarily great k; the exponents ν1,ν2,…,νk run independently all nonnegative integers.
Because the prime factorization
of positive integers is unique (http://planetmath.org/FundamentalTheoremOfArithmetic), we can rewrite (3) as
|
k∏ν=111-1psν=∑(n)1ns, |
|
(4) |
where n runs all positive integers not containing greater prime factors
than pk. Then the inequality
|
pk∑n=11ns<k∏ν=111-1psν, |
|
(5) |
holds for every k, since all the terms 1,1ps1,…,1psk are in the series of the right hand side of (4). On the other hand, this series contains only a part of the terms of (2). Thus, for s>1, the product (3) is less than the sum ζ(s) of the series (2), and consequently
|
pk∑n=11ns<k∏ν=111-1psν<ζ(s). |
|
(6) |
Letting k→∞, we have pk→∞, and the sum on the left hand side of (6) tends to the limit ζ(s), therefore also tends the product (3). Hence we get the limit equation