extension and restriction of states


\PMlinkescapephrase

restrictionPlanetmathPlanetmath

0.1 Restriction of States

Let 𝒜 be a C*-algebra (http://planetmath.org/CAlgebra) and ℬ⊂𝒜 a C*-subalgebra, both having the same identity elementMathworldPlanetmath.

- Given a state ϕ of 𝒜, its restriction (http://planetmath.org/RestrictionOfAFunction) ϕ|ℬ to ℬ is also a state of ℬ.

Remark - Note that the requirement that the C*-algebras 𝒜 and ℬ have a (common) identity element is necessary.

For example, let X be a compact space and C⁢(X) the C*-algebra of continuous functionsMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath X→ℂ. Pick a point x0∈X and consider the C*-subalgebra of continuous functions X→ℂ which vanish at x0. Notice that this subalgebra never has the same identity element of C⁢(X) (the constant function that equals 1). In fact, this subalgebra may not have an identityPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath at all.

Now the evaluation mapping at x0, i.e. the function evx0:C⁢(X)→ℂ

evx0⁢(f):=f⁢(x0)

is a state of C⁢(X). Of course, its restriction to the subalgebra in question is the zero mapping, therefore not being a state.

0.2 Extension of States

Let 𝒜 be a C*-algebra and ℬ⊂𝒜 a C*-subalgebra (not necessarily unital).

Theorem 1 - Every state ϕ of ℬ admits an extensionPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath to a state ϕ~ of 𝒜. Moreover, every pure state ϕ of ℬ admits an extension to a pure state ϕ~ of 𝒜.

Theorem 2 - The set of extensions of a state ϕ of ℬ is a compactPlanetmathPlanetmath and convex subset of S𝒜, the of 𝒜 endowed with the weak-* topologyMathworldPlanetmath.

Title extension and restriction of states
Canonical name ExtensionAndRestrictionOfStates
Date of creation 2013-03-22 18:09:35
Last modified on 2013-03-22 18:09:35
Owner asteroid (17536)
Last modified by asteroid (17536)
Numerical id 10
Author asteroid (17536)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 46L30
Related topic State