subalgebra of a partial algebra


Unlike an algebraic system, where there is only one way to define a subalgebraPlanetmathPlanetmath, there are several ways to define a subalgebra of a partial algebra.

Suppose 𝑨 and 𝑩 are partial algebras of type Ο„:

  1. 1.

    𝑩 is a weak subalgebra of 𝑨 if BβŠ†A, and f𝑩 is a subfunction of f𝑨 for every operator symbol fβˆˆΟ„.

    In words, 𝑩 is a weak subalgebra of 𝑨 iff BβŠ†A, and for each n-ary symbol fβˆˆΟ„, if b1,…,bn∈B such that fB⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined, then fA⁒(b1,…,bn) is also defined, and is equal to fB⁒(b1,…,bn).

  2. 2.

    𝑩 is a relative subalgebra of 𝑨 if BβŠ†A, and f𝑩 is a restriction of f𝑨 relative to B (http://planetmath.org/Subfunction) for every operator symbol fβˆˆΟ„.

    In words, 𝑩 is a relative subalgebra of 𝑨 iff BβŠ†A, and for each n-ary symbol fβˆˆΟ„, given b1,…,bn∈B, fB⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined iff fA⁒(b1,…,bn) is and belongs to B, and they are equal.

  3. 3.

    𝑩 is a subalgebra of 𝑨 if BβŠ†A, and f𝑩 is a restriction (http://planetmath.org/Subfunction) of f𝑨 for every operator symbol fβˆˆΟ„.

    In words, 𝑩 is a subalgebra of 𝑨 iff BβŠ†A, and for each n-ary symbol fβˆˆΟ„, given b1,…,bn∈B, fB⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined iff fA⁒(b1,…,bn) is, and they are equal.

Notice that if 𝑩 is a weak subalgebra of 𝑨, then every constant of 𝑩 is a constant of 𝑨, and vice versa.

Every subalgebra is a relative subalgebra, and every relative subalgebra is a weak subalgebra. But the converseMathworldPlanetmath is false for both statements. Below are two examples.

  1. 1.

    Let F be a field. Then every subalgebra of F is a subfield, and every relative subalgebra of F is a subring.

  2. 2.

    Let A be the set of all non-negative integers, and -A the ordinary subtractionPlanetmathPlanetmath on integers. Consider the partial algebra (A,-A).

    • –

      Let B=A and -B the usual subtraction on integers, but x-By is only defined when x,y∈B have the same parity. Then (B,-B) is a weak subalgebra of (A,-A).

    • –

      Let C be the set of all positive integers, and -C the ordinary subtraction. Then (C,-C) is a relative subalgebra of (A,-A).

    • –

      Let D be the set {0,1,…,n} and -D the ordinary subtraction. Then (D,-D) is a subalgebra of (A,-A).

    Notice that (B,-B) is not a relative subalgebra of (A,-A), since 7-B6 is not defined, even though 7-A⁒6=1∈B, and and (C,-C) is not a subalgebra of (A,-A), since 1-C1 is not defined in C, even though 1-A⁒1 is defined in A.

Remarks.

  1. 1.

    A weak subalgebra 𝑩 of 𝑨 is a relative subalgebra iff given b1,…,bn∈B such that fA⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined and is in B, then fB⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined. A relative subalgebra 𝑩 of 𝑨 is a subalgebra iff whenever fA⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined for bi∈B, it is in B.

  2. 2.

    Let 𝑨 be a partial algebra of type Ο„, and BβŠ†A. For each n-ary function symbol fβˆˆΟ„, define f𝑩 on B as follows: f𝑩⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined in B iff f𝑨⁒(b1,…,bn) is defined in A and f𝑨⁒(b1,…,bn)∈B. This turns 𝑩 into a partial algebra. However, 𝑩 may not be of type Ο„, since f𝑩 may not be defined at all on B. When 𝑩 is a partial algebra of type Ο„, it is a relative subalgebra of 𝑨.

  3. 3.

    When 𝑨 is an algebraMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath, all three notions of subalgebras are equivalentMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath (assuming that the partial operations on a weak subalgebra are all total).

References

Title subalgebra of a partial algebra
Canonical name SubalgebraOfAPartialAlgebra
Date of creation 2013-03-22 18:42:54
Last modified on 2013-03-22 18:42:54
Owner CWoo (3771)
Last modified by CWoo (3771)
Numerical id 10
Author CWoo (3771)
Entry type Definition
Classification msc 08A55
Classification msc 03E99
Classification msc 08A62
Defines weak subalgebra
Defines relative subalgebra
Defines subalgebra