subalgebra of a partial algebra
Unlike an algebraic system, where there is only one way to define a subalgebra, there are several ways to define a subalgebra of a partial algebra.
Suppose π¨ and π© are partial algebras of type Ο:
-
1.
π© is a weak subalgebra of π¨ if BβA, and fπ© is a subfunction of fπ¨ for every operator symbol fβΟ.
In words, π© is a weak subalgebra of π¨ iff BβA, and for each n-ary symbol fβΟ, if b1,β¦,bnβB such that fB(b1,β¦,bn) is defined, then fA(b1,β¦,bn) is also defined, and is equal to fB(b1,β¦,bn).
-
2.
π© is a relative subalgebra of π¨ if BβA, and fπ© is a restriction of fπ¨ relative to B (http://planetmath.org/Subfunction) for every operator symbol fβΟ.
In words, π© is a relative subalgebra of π¨ iff BβA, and for each n-ary symbol fβΟ, given b1,β¦,bnβB, fB(b1,β¦,bn) is defined iff fA(b1,β¦,bn) is and belongs to B, and they are equal.
-
3.
π© is a subalgebra of π¨ if BβA, and fπ© is a restriction (http://planetmath.org/Subfunction) of fπ¨ for every operator symbol fβΟ.
In words, π© is a subalgebra of π¨ iff BβA, and for each n-ary symbol fβΟ, given b1,β¦,bnβB, fB(b1,β¦,bn) is defined iff fA(b1,β¦,bn) is, and they are equal.
Notice that if π© is a weak subalgebra of π¨, then every constant of π© is a constant of π¨, and vice versa.
Every subalgebra is a relative subalgebra, and every relative subalgebra is a weak subalgebra. But the converse is false for both statements. Below are two examples.
-
1.
Let F be a field. Then every subalgebra of F is a subfield, and every relative subalgebra of F is a subring.
-
2.
Let A be the set of all non-negative integers, and -A the ordinary subtraction
on integers. Consider the partial algebra (A,-A).
-
β
Let B=A and -B the usual subtraction on integers, but x-By is only defined when x,yβB have the same parity. Then (B,-B) is a weak subalgebra of (A,-A).
-
β
Let C be the set of all positive integers, and -C the ordinary subtraction. Then (C,-C) is a relative subalgebra of (A,-A).
-
β
Let D be the set {0,1,β¦,n} and -D the ordinary subtraction. Then (D,-D) is a subalgebra of (A,-A).
Notice that (B,-B) is not a relative subalgebra of (A,-A), since 7-B6 is not defined, even though 7-A6=1βB, and and (C,-C) is not a subalgebra of (A,-A), since 1-C1 is not defined in C, even though 1-A1 is defined in A.
-
β
Remarks.
-
1.
A weak subalgebra π© of π¨ is a relative subalgebra iff given b1,β¦,bnβB such that fA(b1,β¦,bn) is defined and is in B, then fB(b1,β¦,bn) is defined. A relative subalgebra π© of π¨ is a subalgebra iff whenever fA(b1,β¦,bn) is defined for biβB, it is in B.
-
2.
Let π¨ be a partial algebra of type Ο, and BβA. For each n-ary function symbol fβΟ, define fπ© on B as follows: fπ©(b1,β¦,bn) is defined in B iff fπ¨(b1,β¦,bn) is defined in A and fπ¨(b1,β¦,bn)βB. This turns π© into a partial algebra. However, π© may not be of type Ο, since fπ© may not be defined at all on B. When π© is a partial algebra of type Ο, it is a relative subalgebra of π¨.
-
3.
When π¨ is an algebra
, all three notions of subalgebras are equivalent
(assuming that the partial operations on a weak subalgebra are all total).
References
-
1
G. GrΓ€tzer: Universal Algebra
, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York (1978).
Title | subalgebra of a partial algebra |
---|---|
Canonical name | SubalgebraOfAPartialAlgebra |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 18:42:54 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 18:42:54 |
Owner | CWoo (3771) |
Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
Numerical id | 10 |
Author | CWoo (3771) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 08A55 |
Classification | msc 03E99 |
Classification | msc 08A62 |
Defines | weak subalgebra |
Defines | relative subalgebra |
Defines | subalgebra |