You are here
Homefundamental groupoid
Primary tabs
fundamental groupoid
Definition 1.
Given a topological space $X$ the fundamental groupoid $\Pi_{1}(X)$ of $X$ is defined as follows:

composition of morphisms is defined via concatenation of paths.
It is easily checked that the above defined category is indeed a groupoid with the inverse of (a morphism represented by) a path being (the homotopy class of) the “reverse” path. Notice that for $x\in X$, the group of automorphisms of $x$ is the fundamental group of $X$ with basepoint $x$,
$\mathrm{Hom}_{{\Pi_{1}(X)}}(x,x)=\pi_{1}(X,x)\,.$ 
Definition 2.
Let $f\colon\thinspace X\to Y$ be a continuous function between two topological spaces. Then there is an induced functor
$\Pi_{1}(f)\colon\thinspace\Pi_{1}(X)\to\Pi_{1}(Y)$ 
defined as follows

on objects $\Pi_{1}(f)$ is just $f$,

on morphisms $\Pi_{1}(f)$ is given by “composing with $f$”, that is if $\alpha\colon\thinspace I\to$ $X$ is a path representing the morphism $[\alpha]\colon\thinspace x\to y$ then a representative of $\Pi_{1}(f)([\alpha])\colon\thinspace f(x)\to f(y)$ is determined by the following commutative diagram
$\xymatrix{{I}\ar[d]_{{\alpha}}\ar@{>}[dr]^{{\Pi_{1}(f)(\alpha)}}\\ {X}\ar[r]_{f}&{Y}}$
It is straightforward to check that the above indeed defines a functor. Therefore $\Pi_{1}$ can (and should) be regarded as a functor from the category of topological spaces to the category of groupoids. This functor is not really homotopy invariant but it is “homotopy invariant up to homotopy” in the sense that the following holds.
Theorem 3.
A homotopy between two continuous maps induces a natural transformation between the corresponding functors.
A reader who understands the meaning of the statement should be able to give an explicit construction and supply the proof without much trouble.
Mathematics Subject Classification
55P99 no label found Forums
 Planetary Bugs
 HS/Secondary
 University/Tertiary
 Graduate/Advanced
 Industry/Practice
 Research Topics
 LaTeX help
 Math Comptetitions
 Math History
 Math Humor
 PlanetMath Comments
 PlanetMath System Updates and News
 PlanetMath help
 PlanetMath.ORG
 Strategic Communications Development
 The Math Pub
 Testing messages (ignore)
 Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907
Jun 24
new question: A good question by Ron Castillo
Jun 23
new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo
Jun 19
new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias