ideal completion of a poset
Let be a poset. Consider the set of all order ideals of .
Theorem 1.
is an algebraic dcpo, such that can be embedded in.
Proof.
We shall list, and when necessary, prove the following series of facts which ultimately prove the main assertion. For convenience, write .
-
1.
is a poset with defined by set theoretic inclusion.
-
2.
For any , .
-
3.
can be embedded in . The function defined by is order preserving and one-to-one. If , and , then , hence . If , we have that and , so , since is antisymmetric.
-
4.
is a dcpo. Suppose is a directed set in . Let . For any , and for some ideals . As is directed, there is such that and . So and hence there is such that and . This shows that is directed. Next, suppose and . Then for some , so as well. This shows that is a down set. So is an ideal of : .
-
5.
For every , is a compact element of . If , where is directed in , then , or , which implies for some ideal . Therefore , and is way below itself: is compact.
-
6.
is an algebraic dcpo. Let . Let . For any , there is such that and . This shows that and in , so that is directed. It is easy to see that . Since is a join of a directed set consisting of compact elements, is algebraic.
This completes the proof. ∎
Definition. is called the ideal completion of .
Remarks.
-
•
In general, the ideal completion of a poset is not a complete lattice. It is complete in the sense of being directed complete. This is different from another type of completion, called the MacNeille completion of , which is a complete lattice.
-
•
If is an upper semilattice, then so is . In fact, the join of any non-empty family of ideals exists. Furthermore, if has a bottom element , then is a complete lattice.
Proof.
Let be a non-empty family of ideals in . Let be the set of consisting of all finite joins of elements of those ideals in , and . Clearly, is a lower set. For every , we have such that and . Since and are both finite joins of elements of those ideals in , so is . Since and , is directed. If is any ideal larger than any of the ideals in , clearly , since is directed. So . Therefore, .
If , then , the bottom of , is the join of the empty family of ideals in . By this entry (http://planetmath.org/CriteriaForAPosetToBeACompleteLattice), is a complete lattice. ∎
-
•
If is a lower semilattice, then so is .
Proof.
Let be two ideals in and . By definition, and are non-empty, so let and . As is a lower semilattice, exists and and . So , and that is non-empty. If , then or . Similarly . Therefore and is a lower set. If , then there is and such that . So and is directed. This means that . ∎
References
- 1 G. Gierz, K. H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J. D. Lawson, M. W. Mislove, D. S. Scott, Continuous Lattices and Domains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
Title | ideal completion of a poset |
---|---|
Canonical name | IdealCompletionOfAPoset |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 17:03:01 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 17:03:01 |
Owner | CWoo (3771) |
Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
Numerical id | 8 |
Author | CWoo (3771) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 06A12 |
Classification | msc 06A06 |
Related topic | LatticeOfIdeals |
Defines | ideal completion |