You are here
Homeorthocomplemented lattice
Primary tabs
orthocomplemented lattice
An orthocomplemented lattice is a complemented lattice in which every element has a distinguished complement, called an orthocomplement, that behaves like the complementary subspace of a subspace in a vector space.
Formally, let $L$ be a complemented lattice and denote $M$ the set of complements of elements of $L$. $M$ is clearly a subposet of $L$, with $\leq$ inherited from $L$. For each $a\in L$, let $M_{a}\subseteq M$ be the set of complements of $a$. $L$ is said to be orthocomplemented if there is a function ${}^{{\perp}}:L\to M$, called an orthocomplementation, whose image is written $a^{{\perp}}$ for any $a\in L$, such that
1. $a^{{\perp}}\in M_{a}$,
2. $(a^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}=a$, and
3.
The element $a^{{\perp}}$ is called an orthocomplement of $a$ (via ${}^{{\perp}}$).
Examples. In addition to the example of the lattice of vector subspaces of a vector space cited above, let’s look at the Hasse diagrams of the two finite complemented lattices below,
$\xymatrix{&1\ar@{}[ld]\ar@{}[d]\ar@{}[rd]&\\ a\ar@{}[rd]&b\ar@{}[d]&c\ar@{}[ld]\\ &0&}\xymatrix{&&1\ar@{}[lld]\ar@{}[ld]\ar@{}[rd]\ar@{}[rrd]&&\\ a\ar@{}[rrd]&b\ar@{}[rd]&&c\ar@{}[ld]&d\ar@{}[lld]\\ &&0&&}$ 
the one on the right is orthocomplemented, while the one on the left is not. From this one deduces that orthcomplementation is not unique, and that the cardinality of any finite orthocomplemented lattice is even.
Remarks.

From the first condition above, we see that an orthocomplementation $\perp$ is a bijection. It is onetoone: if $a^{{\perp}}=b^{{\perp}}$, then $a=(a^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}=(b^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}=b$. And it is onto: if we pick $a\in M\subseteq L$, then $(a^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}=a$. As a result, $M=L$, every element of $L$ is an orthocomplement. Furthermore, we have $0^{{\perp}}=1$ and $1^{{\perp}}=0$.

Let $L^{{\prime}}$ be the dual lattice of $L$ (a lattice having the same underlying set, but with meet and join operations switched). Then any orthocomplementation $\perp$ can be viewed as a lattice isomorphism between $L$ and $L^{{\prime}}$.

From the above conditions, it follows that elements of $L$ satisfy the de Morgan’s laws: for $a,b\in L$, we have
$\displaystyle a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}}=(a\vee b)^{{\perp}},$ (1) $\displaystyle a^{{\perp}}\vee b^{{\perp}}=(a\wedge b)^{{\perp}}.$ (2) To derive the first equation, first note $a\leq a\vee b$. Then $(a\vee b)^{{\perp}}\leq a^{{\perp}}$. Similarly, $(a\vee b)^{{\perp}}\leq b^{{\perp}}$. So $(a\vee b)^{{\perp}}\leq a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}}$. For the other inequality, we start with $a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}}\leq a^{{\perp}}$. Then $a\leq(a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}$. Similarly, $b\leq(a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}$. Therefore, $a\vee b\leq(a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}})^{{\perp}}$, which implies that $a^{{\perp}}\wedge b^{{\perp}}\leq(a\vee b)^{{\perp}}$.

Conversely, any of two equations in the previous remark can replace the third condition in the definition above. For example, suppose we have the second equation $a^{{\perp}}\vee b^{{\perp}}=(a\wedge b)^{{\perp}}$. If $a\leq b$, then $a=a\wedge b$, so $a^{{\perp}}=(a\wedge b)^{{\perp}}=a^{{\perp}}\vee b^{{\perp}}$, which shows that $b^{{\perp}}\leq a^{{\perp}}$.

From the example above, one sees that orthocomplementation need not be unique. An orthocomplemented lattice with a unique orthocomplementation is said to be uniquely orthocomplemented. A uniquely complemented lattice that is also orthocomplemented is uniquely orthocomplemented.

Orthocomplementation can be more generally defined over a bounded poset $P$ by requiring the orthocomplentation operator ${}^{{\perp}}$ to satisfy conditions 2 and 3 above, and a weaker version of condition 1: $a\wedge a^{{\perp}}$ exists and $=0$. Since ${}^{{\perp}}$ is an order reversing bijection on $P$, $0^{{\perp}}=1$ and $1^{{\perp}}=0$. From this, one deduces that $a\wedge a^{{\perp}}=0$ iff $a\vee a^{{\perp}}=1$. A bounded poset in which an orthocomplementation is defined is called an orthocomplemented poset.

In the category of orthocomplemented lattices, the morphism between a pair of objects is a $\{0,1\}$lattice homomorphism $f$ that preserves orthocomplementation:
$f(a^{{\perp}})=f(a)^{{\perp}}.$
References
 1 G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory, AMS Colloquium Publications, Vol. XXV, 3rd Ed. (1967).
Mathematics Subject Classification
03G12 no label found06C15 no label found Forums
 Planetary Bugs
 HS/Secondary
 University/Tertiary
 Graduate/Advanced
 Industry/Practice
 Research Topics
 LaTeX help
 Math Comptetitions
 Math History
 Math Humor
 PlanetMath Comments
 PlanetMath System Updates and News
 PlanetMath help
 PlanetMath.ORG
 Strategic Communications Development
 The Math Pub
 Testing messages (ignore)
 Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Prove that for any sets A, B, and C, An(BUC)=(AnB)U(AnC) by St_Louis
Apr 20
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurementdds.png by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement4.2 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement4.1 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement3.2 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement3.1 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement2.1 by rspuzio
Apr 19
new collection: On the InformationTheoretic Structure of Distributed Measurements by rspuzio
Apr 15
new question: Prove a formula is part of the Gentzen System by LadyAnne
Mar 30
new question: A problem about Euler's totient function by mbhatia