proof of Brouwer fixed point theorem
Given an element we denote (i.e., the -th barycentric coordinate). We also denote . An -face of is the subset .
As was noted in the statement of the theorem, the ’shape’ is unimportant. Therefore, we will prove the following variant of the theorem using the KKM lemma.
Theorem 1 (Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem).
Let be a continuous function. Then, has a fixed point, namely, there is an such that .
Proof.
Clearly, for any and if and only if for all . For each we define the following subset of :
We claim that if is in some -face of () then there is an index such that . Indeed, if is in some -face then . Thus, if then . This shows that
Assuming by contradiction that for all implies that for all . But this leads to a contradiction as the following inequality shows:
This dicussion establishes that each -face is contained in the union . In addition, the subsets are all closed. Therefore, we have shown that the hypothesis of the KKM Lemma holds.
By the KKM lemma there is a point that is in every for . We claim that is a fixed point of . Indeed, for all and thus:
Therefore, for all which implies that . ∎
Title | proof of Brouwer fixed point theorem |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfBrouwerFixedPointTheorem1 |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 18:13:24 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 18:13:24 |
Owner | uriw (288) |
Last modified by | uriw (288) |
Numerical id | 4 |
Author | uriw (288) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 47H10 |
Classification | msc 54H25 |
Classification | msc 55M20 |