## You are here

Homesimplicity of the alternating groups

## Primary tabs

# simplicity of the alternating groups

###### Theorem 1.

If $n\geq 5$, then the alternating group on $n$ symbols, $A_{n}$, is simple.

Throughout the proof we extensively employ the cycle notation, with composition on the left, as is usual. The symmetric group on $n$ symbols is denoted by $S_{n}$.

The following observation will be useful. Let $\pi$ be a permutation written as disjoint cycles

$\pi=(a_{1},a_{2},\ldots,a_{k})(b_{1},b_{2},\ldots,b_{l})\ldots(c_{1},\ldots,c_% {m})$ |

It is easy to check that for every permutation $\sigma\in S_{n}$ we have

$\sigma\pi\sigma^{{-1}}=(\sigma(a_{1}),\sigma(a_{2}),\ldots,\sigma(a_{k}))\,(% \sigma(b_{1}),\sigma(b_{2}),\ldots\sigma(b_{l}))\,\ldots(\sigma(c_{1}),\ldots,% \sigma(c_{m}))$ |

As a consequence, two permutations of $S_{n}$ are conjugate exactly when they have the same cycle type.

Two preliminary results will also be necessary.

###### Lemma 2.

The set of cycles of length $3$ generates $A_{n}$.

###### Proof.

A product of $3$-cycles is an even permutation, so the subgroup generated by all $3$-cycles is therefore contained in $A_{n}$. For the reverse inclusion, by definition every even permutation is the product of even number of transpositions. Thus, it suffices to show that the product of two transpositions can be written as a product of $3$-cycles. There are two possibilities. Either the two transpositions move an element in common, say $(a,b)$ and $(a,c)$, or the two transpositions are disjoint, say $(a,b)$ and $(c,d)$. In the former case,

$(a,b)(a,c)=(a,c,b),$ |

and in the latter,

$(a,b)(c,d)=(a,b,d)(c,b,d).$ |

This establishes the first lemma. ∎

###### Lemma 3.

If a normal subgroup $N\triangleleft A_{n}$ contains a $3$-cycle, then $N=A_{n}$.

###### Proof.

We will show that if $(a,b,c)\in N$, then the assumption of normality implies that any other $(a^{{\prime}},b^{{\prime}},c^{{\prime}})\in N$. This is easy to show, because there is some permutation in $\sigma\in S_{n}$ that under conjugation takes $(a,b,c)$ to $(a^{{\prime}},b^{{\prime}},c^{{\prime}})$, that is

$\sigma(a,b,c)\sigma^{{-1}}=(\sigma(a),\sigma(b),\sigma(c))=(a^{{\prime}},b^{{% \prime}},c^{{\prime}}).$ |

In case $\sigma$ is odd, then (because $n\geq 5$) we can choose some transposition $(d,e)\in A_{n}$ disjoint from $(a^{{\prime}},b^{{\prime}},c^{{\prime}})$ so that

$\sigma(a,b,c)\sigma^{{-1}}=(d,e)(a^{{\prime}},b^{{\prime}},c^{{\prime}})(d,e),$ |

that is,

$\sigma^{{\prime}}(a,b,c)\sigma^{{\prime-1}}=(d,e)\sigma(a,b,c)\sigma^{{-1}}(d,% e)=(a^{{\prime}},b^{{\prime}},c^{{\prime}})$ |

where $\sigma^{{\prime}}$ is even. This means that $N$ contains all $3$-cycles, as $N\triangleleft A_{n}$. Hence, by previous lemma $N=A_{n}$ as required. ∎

# Proof of theorem.

Let $N\triangleleft A_{n}$ be a non-trivial normal subgroup. We will show that $N=A_{n}$. The proof now proceeds by cases. In each case, the normality of $N$ will allow us to reduce the proof to Lemma 2 or to one of the previous cases.

# Case 1.

Suppose that there exists a $\pi\in N$ that, when written as disjoint cycles, has a cycle of length at least $4$, say

$\pi=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3},a_{4},\ldots)\ldots$ |

Upon conjugation by $(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3})\in A_{n}$, we obtain

$\pi^{{\prime}}=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3})\pi(a_{3},a_{2},a_{1})=(a_{2},a_{3},a_{1},a_% {4},\ldots)\ldots$ |

Hence, $\pi^{{\prime}}\in N$, and hence $\pi^{{\prime}}\pi^{{-1}}=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{4})\in N$ also. Notice that the rest of the cycles cancel. By Lemma 3, $N=A_{n}$.

# Case 2.

Suppose that there exists a $\pi\in N$ whose disjoint cycle decomposition has at least two cycles of length 3, say

$\pi=(a,b,c)(d,e,f)\ldots$ |

Conjugation by $(c,d,e)\in A_{n}$ implies that $N$ also contains

$\pi^{{\prime}}=(c,d,e)\pi(e,d,c)=(a,b,d)(e,c,f)\ldots$ |

Hence, $N$ also contains $\pi^{{\prime}}\pi=(a,d,c,b,f)\ldots$. This reduces the proof to Case 1.

# Case 3.

# Case 4.

Suppose there exists a $\pi\in N$ of the form $\pi=(a,b)(c,d)$. Conjugating by $(a,e,b)$ with $e$ distinct from $a,~{}b,~{}c,~{}d$ (at least one such $e$ exists, as $n\geq 5$) yields

$\pi^{{\prime}}=(a,e,b)\pi(b,e,a)=(a,e)(c,d)\in N.$ |

Hence $\pi^{{\prime}}\pi=(a,b,e)\in N$. Again, Lemma 3 applies.

# Case 5.

Suppose that $N$ contains a permutation of the form

$\pi=(a_{1},b_{1})(a_{2},b_{2})(a_{3},b_{3})(a_{4},b_{4})\ldots$ |

This time we conjugate by $(a_{2},b_{1})(a_{3},b_{2})$.

$\pi^{{\prime}}=(a_{2},b_{1})(a_{3},b_{2})\pi(a_{3},b_{2})(a_{2},b_{1})=(a_{1},% a_{2})(a_{3},b_{1})(b_{2},b_{3})(a_{4},b_{4})\ldots.$ |

Observe that

$\pi^{{\prime}}\pi=(a_{1},a_{3},b_{2})(a_{2},b_{3},b_{1})\ldots,$ |

which reduces the proof to Case 2.

Since there exists at least one non-identity $\pi\in N$, and since this $\pi$ is covered by one of the above cases, we conclude that $N=A_{n}$, as was to be shown.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

20D06*no label found*20E32

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff
- Corrections

## Comments

## strange rendering problem

When I view this entry in page image mode, it does not show anything

past the second lemma. In fact, I almost filed a correction asking

the author to finish the proof!