You are here
Homescheme
Primary tabs
scheme
1 Introduction
In order to extend algebraic geometry to deal with fields that are not algebraically closed, it is necessary to generalize the notions of affine variety and projective variety. The most suitable generalization seems to be the notion of a scheme. A scheme in some sense captures the equations defining an algebraic object, so that the points of that object can be examined over many different fields. In fact, the points of such an object take a secondary role: this is necessary because, for example, over a finite field most curves have no points at all until you pass to a suitable field extension. The underlying machinery allowing this is the tensor product of rings: given a $k$algebra $A$ and a field extension $K$ of $k$, $A\otimes_{k}K$ is the $K$algebra that is, in some sense, defined by the same equations as $A$.
Along with this ability to deal with varying base fields, schemes offer a great number of other possibilities. In particular, the tools for dealing with individual schemes can usually also be adapted to deal with families of schemes. These families can even span different characteristics, which can be a powerful tool for applying the tools of characteristic zero geometry to problems in positive characteristic.
2 Definitions
An affine scheme is a locally ringed space $(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})$ with the property that there exists a ring $R$ (commutative, with identity) whose prime spectrum $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is isomorphic to $X$ as a locally ringed space.
A scheme is a locally ringed space $(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})$ which has an open cover $\{U_{\alpha}\}_{{\alpha\in I}}$ with the property that each open set $U_{\alpha}$, together with its restriction sheaf $\mathcal{O}_{X}_{{U_{\alpha}}}$, is an affine scheme.
We define a morphism of schemes between two schemes $(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})$ and $(Y,\mathcal{O}_{Y})$ to be a morphism of locally ringed spaces $f:(X,\mathcal{O}_{X})\longrightarrow(Y,\mathcal{O}_{Y})$.
With these definitions, schemes of course form a category. However, frequently one wishes to work in a slightly different category, such as the category of βcomplex schemesβ, that is, schemes obtained from complex algebras. However, these schemes will have strange automorphisms obtained from automorphisms of the complex numbers. In order to prevent this problem, we often look at another category.
Fix a scheme $Y$. Then a scheme over $Y$ is defined to be a scheme $X$ together with a morphism of schemes $X\longrightarrow Y$, called the structure morphism of $X$. A morphism $X\to X^{{\prime}}$ of schemes over $Y$ is a morphism $X\to X^{{\prime}}$ which makes the following diagram commute:
$\xymatrix{X\ar[rr]\ar[dr]&&X^{{\prime}}\ar[dl]\\ &Y&}$ 
The resulting category is called the category of schemes over $Y$, and is sometimes denoted $\text{Sch}/Y$. Frequently, $Y$ will be the spectrum of a ring (or especially a field) $R$, and in this case we will also call this the category of schemes over $R$ (rather than schemes over $\operatorname{Spec}R$).
Observe that this resolves the problem of automorphisms of the complex numbers leading to automorphisms of schemes over $\mathbb{C}$.
If $Y$ is not simply the spectrum of a field (perhaps it is a curve or some more general scheme) then one should interpret this as saying that $X$ is a family of schemes; for each point of $Y$, we have a scheme, namely the fiber of $X$ over that point of $Y$.
Note: Some authors, notably Mumford and Grothendieck, require that a scheme be separated as well (and use the term prescheme to describe a scheme that is not separated), but we will not impose this requirement.
For many problems, the points of the underlying topological space of a scheme do not represent what we want to work with. For example, if we take the coordinate ring $R$ of a variety over an algebraically closed field $k$, $\operatorname{Spec}R$ (as a scheme over $k$) behaves very much like the variety in question, but there are βextraβ points in the underlying topological space: for every irreducible closed subset, we have a point whose closure is the whole subset. Such a point is called a generic point. As a result, we have a more elaborate definition for a point on a scheme.
Fix a scheme $S$. Then an $S$point on a scheme $X$ is a morphism $S\to X$. If $X$ is a scheme over $Y$, then this morphism is expected to be a $Y$morphism. The functor $S\mapsto\operatorname{Hom}(S,X)$ is called the functor of points on $X$. The set of $S$points on $X$ is denoted $X(S)$. If $R$ is a ring, then $X(\operatorname{Spec}R)$ is often written $X(R)$. Thus, for example, the complex points on $X$ might be written $X(\mathbb{C})$.
3 Examples

Every affine scheme is clearly a scheme as well. In particular, $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is a scheme for any commutative ring $R$.

Every variety can be interpreted as a scheme. An affine variety corresponds to the prime spectrum of its coordinate ring, and a projective variety has an open cover by affine pieces each of which is an affine variety, and hence an affine scheme.
4 References
See the bibliography for algebraic geometry. Hartshorneβs book, Algebraic Geometry, is an excellent reference for these ideas.
Mathematics Subject Classification
14A15 no label found Forums
 Planetary Bugs
 HS/Secondary
 University/Tertiary
 Graduate/Advanced
 Industry/Practice
 Research Topics
 LaTeX help
 Math Comptetitions
 Math History
 Math Humor
 PlanetMath Comments
 PlanetMath System Updates and News
 PlanetMath help
 PlanetMath.ORG
 Strategic Communications Development
 The Math Pub
 Testing messages (ignore)
 Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Prove that for any sets A, B, and C, An(BUC)=(AnB)U(AnC) by St_Louis
Apr 20
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurementdds.png by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement4.2 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement4.1 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement3.2 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement3.1 by rspuzio
new image: informationtheoreticdistributedmeasurement2.1 by rspuzio
Apr 19
new collection: On the InformationTheoretic Structure of Distributed Measurements by rspuzio
Apr 15
new question: Prove a formula is part of the Gentzen System by LadyAnne
Mar 30
new question: A problem about Euler's totient function by mbhatia
Attached Articles
Corrections
link on "separated" by AxelBoldt β
Structure morphism by archibal β
variety of different fields by iwnbap β
typo by yark β