biquadratic field
A biquadratic field (or biquadratic number field) is a biquadratic extension of ℚ. To discuss these fields more easily, the set S will be defined to be the set of all squarefree integers not equal to 1. Thus, any biquadratic field is of the form ℚ(√m,√n) for distinct elements m and n of S.
Let k=mn(gcd(m,n))2. It can easily be verified that k∈S, k≠m, and k≠n. Since √k=√mngcd(m,n)∈ℚ(√m,√n), the three distinct quadratic subfields of ℚ(√m,√n) are ℚ(√m), ℚ(√n), and ℚ(√k). Note that ℚ(√k)=ℚ(√mn).
Of the three cyclotomic fields of degree (http://planetmath.org/ExtensionField) four over ℚ, ℚ(ω8) and ℚ(ω12) are biquadratic fields. The quadratic subfields of ℚ(ω8) are ℚ(√2), ℚ(√-1), and ℚ(√-2); the quadratic subfields of ℚ(ω12) are ℚ(√3), ℚ(√-1), and ℚ(√-3).
Note that the only rational prime p for which e(P|p)=4 is possible in a biquadratic field is p=2. (The notation e(P|p) refers to the ramification index of the prime ideal P over p.) This occurs for biquadratic fields ℚ(√m,√n) in which exactly two of m, n, and k are equivalent
(http://planetmath.org/Congruences
) to 2mod4 and the other is to 3mod4. For example, in ℚ(ω8)=ℚ(√2,√-1), we have that e(P|2)=4.
Certain biquadratic fields provide excellent counterexamples to statements that some people might think to be true. For example, the biquadratic field K=ℚ(√2,√-3) is useful for demonstrating that a subring of a principal ideal domain need not be a principal ideal domain. It can easily be verified that 𝒪K (the ring of integers
of K) is a principal ideal domain, but ℤ[√-6], which is a subring of 𝒪K, is not a principal ideal domain. Also, biquadratic fields of the form L=ℚ(√m,√n) with m and n distinct elements of S such that m≡1mod3 and n≡1mod3 are useful for demonstrating that rings of integers need not have power bases over ℤ (http://planetmath.org/PowerBasisOverMathbbZ). Note that 3 splits completely in both ℚ(√m) and ℚ(√n) and thus in L. Therefore, 3𝒪L=P1P2P3P4 for distinct prime ideals (http://planetmath.org/PrimeIdeal) P1, P2, P3, and P4 of 𝒪L. Now suppose 𝒪L=ℤ[α] for some α∈L. Then L=ℚ(α), and the minimal polynomial f for α over ℚ has degree 4. This yields that f, considered as a polynomial
over 𝔽3, is supposed to factor into four distinct monic polynomials
of degree 1, which is a contradiction
.
Title | biquadratic field |
---|---|
Canonical name | BiquadraticField |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 15:56:24 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 15:56:24 |
Owner | Wkbj79 (1863) |
Last modified by | Wkbj79 (1863) |
Numerical id | 16 |
Author | Wkbj79 (1863) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 11R16 |
Synonym | biquadratic number field |
Related topic | BiquadraticExtension |
Related topic | BiquadraticEquation2 |