quantization
0.1 Introduction
Quantization is understood as the process of defining a formal correspondence between a quantum system operator (such as the quantum Hamiltonian operator) or quantum algebra and a classical system operator (such as the Hamiltonian) or a classical algebra, such as the Poisson algebra. Theoretical quantum physicists often proceed in two ‘stages’, so that both first and second quantization procedures were reported in QFT, for example. Generalized quantization procedures involve asymptotic morphisms and Wigner–Weyl–Moyal quantization procedures or noncommutative ‘deformations’ of C*-algebras (http://planetmath.org/CAlgebra3) associated with quantum operators on Hilbert spaces (as in noncommutative geometry). The non-commutative algebra of quantum observable operators is a Clifford algebra (http://planetmath.org/CliffordAlgebra), and the associated -Clifford algebra (http://planetmath.org/CCliffordAlgebra) is a fundamental concept of modern mathematical treatments of quantum theories. Note, however, that classical systems, including Einstein’s general relativity are commutative (or Abelian) theories, whereas quantum theories are intrinsically non-commutative (or non-Abelian), most likely as a consequnece of the non-comutativity of quantum logics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.
This definition is quite broad, and as a result there are many approaches to quantization, employing a variety of techniques. It should be emphasized the result of quantization is not unique; in fact, methods of quantization usually possess inherent ambiguities, in the sense that, while performing quantization, one usually must make choices at certain points of the process.
Classical systems
Definition 1.
A classical system is a triplet , where (the phase space) is a symplectic manifold and (the Hamiltonian) is a smooth function on .
In most physical examples the phase space is the cotangent bundle of a manifold . In this case, is called the configuration space.
Definition 2.
-
1.
A classical state is a point in .
-
2.
A classical observable is a function on .
In classical mechanics, one studies the time-evolution of a classical system. The time-evolution of an observable is described the equation
(1) |
where is the Poisson bracket. Equation (1) is equivalent to the Hamilton equations.
Remark.
A classical system is sometimes defined more generally as a triplet , where is a Poisson structure on .
Quantum systems
Definition 3.
A quantum system is a pair , where is a Hilbert space and is a self-adjoint linear operator on .
If is a quantum system, is referred to as the (quantum) phase space and is referred to as the Hamiltonian operator.
Definition 4.
-
1.
A quantum state is a vector in .
-
2.
A quantum observable is a self-adjoint linear operator on .
The space of quantum observables is denoted . If and are in , then
(2) |
is in (Planck’s constant appears as a scaling factor arising from physical considerations). The operation thus gives the structure of a Lie algebra.
The time evolution of a quantum observable is described by the equation
(3) |
Equation (3) is equivalent to the time-dependent Schrödinger’s equation
(4) |
The problem of quantization
The problem of quantization is to find a correspondence between a quantum system and a classical system; this is clearly not always possible. Thus, specific methods of quantization describe several ways of constructing a pair from a triplet . Furthermore, in order to give physical meaning to the observables in the quantum system, there should be a map
(5) |
satisfying the following conditions:
-
1.
is a Lie algebra homomorphism,
-
2.
.
Remark.
Note that is not an algebra homomorphism. Much of the complexity of quantization lies in the fact that, while is a commutative algebra, its image in necessarily does not commute.
The following is a list of some well-known methods of quantization:
- •
-
•
Geometric quantization
-
•
Deformation quantization
-
•
Path-integral quantization
A detailed example of geometric quantization on quantum Riemannian spaces can be found in ref. [1].
References
- 1 Abhay Ashtekar and Jerzy Lewandowski. 2005. Quantum Geometry and Its Applications. http://cgpg.gravity.psu.edu/people/Ashtekar/articles/qgfinal.pdfAvailable PDF download.
Title | quantization |
Canonical name | Quantization |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 15:36:59 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 15:36:59 |
Owner | bci1 (20947) |
Last modified by | bci1 (20947) |
Numerical id | 27 |
Author | bci1 (20947) |
Entry type | Topic |
Classification | msc 81S10 |
Classification | msc 53D50 |
Classification | msc 46L65 |
Classification | msc 81R50 |
Classification | msc 81R15 |
Synonym | quantisation |
Synonym | canonical quantization |
Synonym | Weyl-quantization |
Related topic | CCliffordAlgebra |
Related topic | AsymptoticMorphismsAndWignerWeylMoyalQuantizationProcedures |
Related topic | HamiltonianEquations |
Related topic | PoissonBracket |
Related topic | SchrodingersWaveEquation |
Related topic | CanonicalQuantization |
Related topic | HamiltonianOperatorOfAQuantumSystem |
Related topic | QuantumSpaceTimes |
Related topic | QFTOrQuantumFieldTheories |
Related topic | QEDInTh |
Defines | classical system |
Defines | classical state |
Defines | classical observable |
Defines | quantum system |
Defines | quantum state |
Defines | quantum observable |