homotopes and isotopes of algebras
1 Geometric motivations
In the study projective geometries a first step in developing
properties of the geometry is to uncover coordinates of the geometry. For example, Desargues’ theorem (and Pappaus’ theorem) are methods to uncover division rings(and fields) which can be used to coordinatize every line in the geometry – that is, every line will be in a 1-1 correspondence with a fixed
division ring (plus a formal ∞ point) called the coordinate ring of the geometry. Form this
one can often coordinatize the entire geometry, that is, represent the
geometry as subspaces
of a vector space
over the division ring.
There is a common problem with these constructions: the coordinates depend
on fixing reference points in the geometry. If we change the reference
points we change the product in the coordinate ring as well. Fortunately,
nice geometries generally do not allow for too much variance to occur with
a change of reference points. However, to track these geometric changes we
create an algebraic process to restructure the multiplication of a fixed
ring. The process is called a homotope
of the algebra
or an isotope when the process is reversible. These geometrically inspired
terms reflect the original applications of the process, but in some theorems
they now find multiple other applications unrelated to geometry.
2 Associative homotopes and isotopes
Given a unital associative algebra A and an element a∈A, we define the
homotope of A as the algebra A(a) which retains the same module
structure of A but where we replace the multiplication by
x⋅ay:= |
By the assumption of associativity makes sense. A homotope is an isotope if is invertible
. We now prove all isotopes are isomorphic
algebras.
Proposition 1.
If is invertible in then is isomorphic as algebras to
via the map . Furthermore, the identity of is
.
Proof.
As is invertible, the map we describe is an isomorphism of modules.
To verify the multiplication let . Then
Furthermore, so is the identity of . ∎
3 Non-associative homotopes and isotopes
Returning to projective geometries, it is known that projective planes can
include rather exceptional examples such as planes which do not satisfy
Desargues’ theorem (and consequently they do not satisfy Pappaus’ theorem).
This means it is not possible to use the standard approach to apply coordinates rings to the lines of the geometry. An example of these include certain
Moufang planes. This however is simply a lack of flexibility in the
definition of coordinates. For it is known that using Octonion’s as a division
algebra
(non-associative) the Moufang planes can be coordinatized. Therefore,
the geometric process of isotopes and homotopes will force a construction
of isotopes and homotopes of non-associative algebras.
For example, in a unital Jordan algebra , a homotope/isotope can be built
by means of the Jordan triple product:
which in a special Jordan algebra takes the more familiar form:
We call this product the -homotope of and denote it by . When is invertible in the Jordan product then we call this an isotope of . Unlike associative algebras, an isotope of a Jordan algebra need not be an isomorphic algebra.
4 Non-geometric applications of homotopes
Given an element , we say is left/right quasi-invertible
if for all , and are left and right invertible respectively. It is a classic theorem that the Jacobson radical is
comprised of all left quasi-invertible elements. McCrimmon showed
that expressed in homotopes we can instead say: is quasi-invertible
if is quasi-invertible in every homotope of . This gives the
characterization:
The radical
of an associative algebra is the set of elements which are (left) quasi-invertible in every homotope of .
It is this version of an element description of Jacobson radicals which can be generalized to non-associative algebras. First one must define homotopes and isotopes for the given non-associative algebra.
Theorem 2 (McCrimmon, Jacobson).
The radical of a Jordan algebra is equivalently defined as:
-
1.
The largest solvable
ideal in .
-
2.
The set of all elements for which is invertible in every homotope of . We call such properly quasi-invertible.
-
3.
The intersection
of all maximal inner ideals of .
5 Principal homotopes
So far we have used only a subset of all possible homotopes because we have
insisted thus far that we use elements from the orignal algebra to induce the
homotope. These are what Albert calls a principal homotope. However,
there are often reasons to allow for external parameters. For example, if
a non-associative algebra is embedded in an associative envelope ,
one may use an element to induce a homotope or isotope of .
Another possible approach is to modify the terms of the product with
involutions , for example,
Such constructions require a more general treatment of homotopes and isotopes which leads to the general definition:
Definition 3.
Given a non-associative -algebra , a homotope of is triple of
-endomorphisms of such that:
A homotope is an isotope if the maps , and are invertible.
References
- 1 Jacobson, Nathan Structure Theory of Jordan Algebras, The University of Arkansas Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 5, Fayetteville, 1981.
- 2 McCrimmon, Kevin A Taste of Jordan Algebras, Springer, New York, 2004.
Title | homotopes and isotopes of algebras |
---|---|
Canonical name | HomotopesAndIsotopesOfAlgebras |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:27:24 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:27:24 |
Owner | Algeboy (12884) |
Last modified by | Algeboy (12884) |
Numerical id | 6 |
Author | Algeboy (12884) |
Entry type | Derivation |
Classification | msc 17A01 |
Related topic | QuasiRegularity |
Defines | homotope |
Defines | isotope |
Defines | quasi-invertible |